SaveMyCert
Log in
5 of 5 free questions left today·for 10 a day
PMI-ACP · Domain 1

Mindset practice questions

Mindset is worth 28% of the PMI-ACP exam — the heaviest of the 4 domains. Living the agile mindset: experimenting early, agile values and complexity models, collaborative and psychologically safe teams, transparency, short feedback loops and embracing change. Official weighting 28%. 6 fully worked examples are further down this page, answers included.

Exam weight
28%
the heaviest of the 4 domains
Questions
266
across 7 topics
Free, no account
5/day
a free account allows 10 a day
Explanations
Every option
right and wrong

Build a practice session

5 free questions left today.

Domains

How many?

Mode

Ready when you are

10 fresh questions drawn across 1 of 4 domains, in Learn mode.

Review what you missed

Every question you answer incorrectly, and every question you flag while practising, is saved here automatically. Finish a session and you can come back to re-drill just those.

6 sample Mindset questions, fully explained

Questions from the PMI-ACP bank mapped to domain 1, with the answer key and the reasoning behind every option. None of them repeat the examples on the main PMI-ACP practice page.

Question 1Mindset

A team wants to try a new checkout flow with real customers early, but it must limit the damage if the flow lowers completed purchases. Which practice best supports this?

Choose one.

  • a
    Release it behind a feature toggle to a small cohort Correct

    A toggle limited to a small cohort puts the flow in front of real customers while keeping exposure small and easy to switch off.

  • b
    Release it to the full customer base at the next launch

    Releasing to the whole customer base exposes everyone to the risk and delays the learning until the next launch.

  • c
    Test it with internal staff in a staging environment

    Staff in staging are not real customers, so this cannot show the effect on completed purchases.

  • d
    Hold it until the full regression suite is automated

    Automation is useful but unrelated to limiting customer exposure, and waiting delays the experiment.

The concept

Safe-to-fail experiments limit how many users a change reaches and make it quick to reverse, so teams can learn in production early.

Why that’s the answer

The team needs real customers (to see the effect on purchases) and limited damage. A feature toggle on a small cohort gives both. A full release maximises damage, staging has no real customers, and waiting for automation postpones the learning.

How to reason it out
  1. List the two needs: real customers and limited damage.
  2. Look for an option that controls exposure.
  3. Check it can be reversed quickly.
  4. Reject options that miss either need.

Exam tip: Feature toggles plus small cohorts make production experiments cheap to fail.

PMI-ACP Experiment Early: MVPs, Spikes, Hypotheses and a Culture of Innovation — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 2Mindset

Team members have ideas for improving the product, but every iteration is fully loaded with committed backlog items, so nothing gets tried. What should the agile practitioner do to create an environment for innovation?

Choose one.

  • a
    Ask team members to explore their ideas after working hours

    Pushing exploration into personal time is unsustainable and signals that learning is not valued work.

  • b
    Collect the ideas in a document for the next annual planning

    Waiting for annual planning delays any learning by months, the opposite of experimenting early.

  • c
    Agree reserved experiment capacity with the product owner Correct

    Reserving capacity with the product owner makes experimenting part of normal, planned work instead of something squeezed in.

  • d
    Ask the sponsor to approve each idea first

    An approval step per idea adds friction and slows the small experiments the team needs to run.

The concept

Teams innovate only when experimenting has real, planned capacity — it cannot live in the gaps of a fully loaded iteration.

Why that’s the answer

The barrier is capacity: every slot is filled with committed work. Agreeing reserved capacity with the product owner, who orders the work, removes that barrier. After-hours work is unsustainable, annual planning is far too slow, and per-idea sponsor approval adds friction.

How to reason it out
  1. Identify the barrier: no capacity for trying ideas.
  2. Recognise who controls capacity trade-offs: the product owner.
  3. Pick the option that builds experiments into normal work.
  4. Reject options that delay ideas or add approval friction.

Exam tip: Make room for experiments in the plan; innovation squeezed into spare time rarely happens.

PMI-ACP Experiment Early: MVPs, Spikes, Hypotheses and a Culture of Innovation — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 3Mindset

A team is planning a marketplace app that matches dog walkers with owners. Local walkers already pay similar commissions to agencies, and the map component uses a library the team has shipped twice. Which assumption should the team test first?

Choose one.

  • a
    That owners will trust walkers they have never met Correct

    Nothing the team knows supports this assumption, and if owners won't trust strangers nobody books a walk, so it is both the most uncertain and the most damaging.

  • b
    That walkers will accept the proposed commission

    The stem says walkers already pay similar commissions, so there is existing evidence for this assumption.

  • c
    That the map component will load within performance targets

    The team has shipped this library twice, so feasibility here is low risk.

  • d
    That owners prefer booking walks on mobile over desktop

    This is also untested, but if it is wrong the team simply adjusts the design; it would not sink the product the way a lack of trust would.

The concept

Experiment early on the riskiest assumption: the one that is both most uncertain and most damaging to the product if it turns out false.

Why that’s the answer

The stem gives evidence for the commission and map assumptions. Owner trust and booking-channel preference are both untested, so impact decides: if owners won't trust strangers, nobody books walks, whereas a wrong channel guess only changes the design. Testing trust first gives the most learning per unit of effort.

How to reason it out
  1. List each assumption and the evidence the stem gives for it.
  2. Rate each for uncertainty and impact if wrong.
  3. Pick the one that is high on both.
  4. Plan the cheapest experiment that tests it.

Exam tip: Test first what is least known and most fatal if wrong.

PMI-ACP Experiment Early: MVPs, Spikes, Hypotheses and a Culture of Innovation — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 4Mindset

A team plans an experiment to find out whether a shorter sign-up form increases the share of visitors who complete registration. Which TWO steps make the result most trustworthy? (Select TWO.)

Choose TWO.

  • a
    State the expected rise in completion rate before launch Correct

    Agreeing the expected change up front makes the hypothesis falsifiable and stops the team reading success into any result afterwards.

  • b
    Count total views of the sign-up form during the test

    Views measure traffic, not the completion rate the hypothesis is about.

  • c
    Run the test during the annual sales campaign for traffic

    Campaign visitors arrive with different motives from normal traffic, so a result measured during the campaign may not hold once it ends.

  • d
    Ask visitors who finished the form to rate the new design

    Ratings from people who completed it are opinions from a biased group and say nothing about those who dropped out.

  • e
    Compare against visitors who still see the current form Correct

    A control group running at the same time shows whether the change, not the season or traffic mix, caused any difference.

The concept

A trustworthy product experiment has a falsifiable hypothesis with a success threshold set in advance and a comparison that isolates the change.

Why that’s the answer

Setting the expected change before launch makes the experiment a real test, and a concurrent control group isolates the effect of the shorter form. Page views measure the wrong thing, a sales campaign adds noise, and ratings from completers are biased opinions.

How to reason it out
  1. Restate the hypothesis: shorter form raises completion rate.
  2. Ask what defines success before the data arrives.
  3. Ask what isolates the form's effect from other causes.
  4. Reject measures that are off-target or biased.

Exam tip: Agree the success threshold first, and compare against a control.

PMI-ACP Experiment Early: MVPs, Spikes, Hypotheses and a Culture of Innovation — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 5Mindset

A team's hypothesis was that a redesigned onboarding flow would raise the share of new users who finish account setup. Its experiment report shows that page views rose 40% and total sign-ups hit a record during a marketing campaign. What should the agile practitioner point out?

Choose one.

  • a
    The reported figures don't measure the hypothesis Correct

    Page views and total sign-ups are driven by the campaign; neither shows the share of new users who finished setup.

  • b
    The test ran too long to produce reliable figures

    Nothing in the report suggests the duration was a problem; the issue is which numbers were reported.

  • c
    The record numbers confirm the hypothesis, so roll it out

    Record traffic during a campaign says nothing about the setup completion rate the hypothesis named.

  • d
    The test needs repeating with even more page views

    More page views would not help; the report is missing the completion rate entirely.

The concept

Vanity metrics (views, totals) can rise for reasons unrelated to the change. An experiment must report the metric its hypothesis names.

Why that’s the answer

The hypothesis is about a rate (share completing setup). The report shows totals that a campaign would inflate regardless of the redesign. The practitioner should redirect the team to the completion rate, ideally against a control. Rolling out or gathering more views repeats the same mistake.

How to reason it out
  1. Find the metric the hypothesis names: setup completion rate.
  2. Check whether the report contains it.
  3. Notice the campaign could explain the reported rise.
  4. Ask for the hypothesis metric before deciding.

Exam tip: Judge an experiment by the metric in its hypothesis, not by numbers that merely went up.

PMI-ACP Experiment Early: MVPs, Spikes, Hypotheses and a Culture of Innovation — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 6Mindset

A product owner wants to learn within two days whether warehouse pickers can follow a proposed three-step picking workflow, before any code is written. Which artifact should the team build?

Choose one.

  • a
    A paper or clickable mock-up pickers can try Correct

    A low-fidelity mock-up can be made in hours and lets pickers try the workflow, which answers the usability question within two days.

  • b
    A working first release of the picking module

    Working software cannot be built in two days and the product owner wants an answer before code is written.

  • c
    A detailed specification for pickers to review

    Reading a specification does not show whether pickers can actually follow the steps in practice.

  • d
    An architectural spike on the scanner integration

    A spike answers technical questions; the open question here is whether people can follow the workflow.

The concept

Match the experiment to the question: workflow and usability questions are answered fastest by low-fidelity prototypes tried by real users.

Why that’s the answer

The question is about people following a workflow, the deadline is two days and no code is wanted yet. A paper or clickable mock-up meets all three. Working software is too slow, a specification tests reading not doing, and a spike tests technology.

How to reason it out
  1. Classify the question: usability, not technology.
  2. Note the constraints: two days, no code.
  3. Pick the cheapest artifact real pickers can try.
  4. Reject options that address another question.

Exam tip: Use the lowest-fidelity prototype that still answers the question.

PMI-ACP Experiment Early: MVPs, Spikes, Hypotheses and a Culture of Innovation — the lesson that teaches this.

What PMI-ACP domain 1 tests, topic by topic

The official exam guide breaks Mindset into 7 topics. The question bank follows the same split, so a weak topic shows up as a cluster of misses you can go back and read.

Published PMI-ACP practice questions per topic in Mindset
TopicWhat it coversQuestions
Experiment earlyOfficial PMI-ACP ECO (November 2024, rev. March 2026), Domain I Task 1. Enablers: Build an increment of the product to validate solution and/or market need; Create an environment to innovate, learn, and grow.38
Embrace agile mindsetOfficial PMI-ACP ECO (November 2024, rev. March 2026), Domain I Task 2. Enablers: Use agile values and principles; Apply the appropriate complexity method/domain to the complexity theory system (i.e. CAS, Stacey Matrix, Cynefin) to classify scenarios; Identify the application and importance or risks of each complexity system theory given a specific scenario; Interpret the output of agile suitability tools; Integrate agile models based on needs (e.g., use case, team, project, organization).38
Promote collaborative team environmentOfficial PMI-ACP ECO (November 2024, rev. March 2026), Domain I Task 3. Enablers: Establish team vision and working agreements; Form and develop a high performing team; Use retrospective findings to improve the team; Use collaboration practices to breakdown silos; Commit to the team's decisions even in disagreement; Evaluate the team's understanding of agile to tailor the agile approach; Identify the key factors to consider when determining the appropriate inter-team coordination approach (e.g., scrum of scrums, team of teams).38
Build transparencyOfficial PMI-ACP ECO (November 2024, rev. March 2026), Domain I Task 4. Enablers: Make status, progress, process, risks, impediments, and learning accessible to all (e.g., using information radiators); Establish a feedback loop for team; Define communication strategies for co-located and distributed teams.38
Foster psychological safetyOfficial PMI-ACP ECO (November 2024, rev. March 2026), Domain I Task 5. Enablers: Promote a no blame culture by encouraging objectivity; Encourage dialogue over debate; Solicit and provide constructive feedback. Act on it; Encourage challenging the status quo.38
Shorten feedback loopsOfficial PMI-ACP ECO (November 2024, rev. March 2026), Domain I Task 6. Enablers: Include the stakeholders from day one; Maximize value given a specific timeframe; Use tools and techniques to shorten feedback (e.g., design thinking and lean startup).38
Embrace changeOfficial PMI-ACP ECO (November 2024, rev. March 2026), Domain I Task 7. Enablers: Promote a growth mindset to respond to change; Embrace process adaptation by responding to changing requirements and priorities; Encourage and model cross skills (e.g., generalizing specialists); Adapt to product needs based on the learning and feedback.38
Total266

Revise Mindset before you drill it

Other PMI-ACP domains

Mindset: your questions

Mindset is domain 1 of the PMI-ACP exam guide and carries 28% of the scored content — the heaviest of the 4 domains. On a 120-question paper that works out to roughly 34 questions, though PMI does not publish an exact per-domain count and individual exam forms vary.

Source

The domain weight and topic list on this page come from the official PMI-ACP exam guide.