A company is commissioning its own HSMs in a colocation cage. Policy says that if someone physically breaks into a module, the keys inside must be destroyed before an attacker can read them. Which HSM capability does this policy require?
Choose one.
Physical tamper protection in an HSM ranges from evidence of tampering to active detection and response that zeroizes keys.
The policy asks for an active reaction: detect the intrusion and destroy the keys first. That is tamper response with zeroization, which FIPS 140-3 associates with its higher physical security levels. Tamper evidence only proves later that the module was opened. Quorum and wrapped backups are sound controls, but they address insider misuse and key availability, not a physical attack on the hardware.
- Identify the threat: physical intrusion into the module.
- Separate detecting tampering afterwards from reacting to it in real time.
- Pick the capability that erases keys when tampering is detected.
Exam tip: Tamper evident shows it happened; tamper responsive zeroizes the keys while it happens.
CCSP Building Secure Cloud Infrastructure: HSM, TPM, Secure Defaults, Virtual Hardware and Guest Tools — the lesson that teaches this.