SaveMyCert
Log in
5 of 5 free questions left today·for 30 a day
AB-900 · Domain 2

Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot practice questions

Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot is worth 38% of the AB-900 exam — the heaviest of the 3 domains. Microsoft Purview (Information Protection, DLP, Insider Risk Management, Communication Compliance, DSPM for AI, Data Lifecycle Management), sensitivity labels, classification and retention, how Copilot accesses data through Microsoft Graph and permissions, responsible AI, and finding risks and oversharing. Official weight range 35–40%. 6 fully worked examples are further down this page, answers included.

Exam weight
38%
the heaviest of the 3 domains
Questions
82
across 2 topics
Free, no account
5/day
a free account allows 30 a day
Explanations
Every option
right and wrong

Build a practice session

5 free questions left today.

Domains

How many?

Mode

Ready when you are

10 fresh questions drawn across 1 of 3 domains, in Learn mode.

Focused review

Every question you answer incorrectly, and every question you flag while practising, is saved here automatically. Finish a session and you can come back to re-drill just those.

6 sample Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot questions, fully explained

Questions from the AB-900 bank mapped to domain 2, with the answer key and the reasoning behind every option. None of them repeat the examples on the main AB-900 practice page.

Question 1Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot

Thousands of existing files in SharePoint contain passport numbers. Nobody plans to open or edit them, but the compliance team wants them labeled Confidential. What should the admin configure?

Choose one.

  • a
    Auto-labeling settings on the Confidential label for Office apps

    Client-side auto-labeling runs in the Office app while a user edits the file, so files nobody opens are never labeled.

  • b
    A default sensitivity label in the label policy

    A default label is applied to new or unlabeled documents that users create or edit. Untouched files keep no label.

  • c
    Mandatory labeling in the label policy for SharePoint site members

    Mandatory labeling forces users to pick a label when they save in an Office app. It does nothing for files no one is editing, whichever users the policy is published to.

  • d
    An auto-labeling policy for SharePoint and OneDrive sites Correct

    A service-side auto-labeling policy scans content at rest and labels matching files without any user opening them.

The concept

Sensitivity labels can be applied manually, by default, by required (mandatory) labeling, by client-side auto-labeling in Office apps, or by service-side auto-labeling policies.

Why that’s the answer

The deciding detail is that nobody will open the files. Every client-side option (auto-labeling in the label for Office apps, default labels, mandatory labeling) only acts when a user creates, edits or saves a document. A service-side auto-labeling policy runs in SharePoint and OneDrive (and Exchange for mail in transit), finds content that matches sensitive information types and applies the label without user involvement.

How to reason it out
  1. Notice the files are at rest and won't be edited.
  2. Separate client-side methods (need a user in the app) from service-side policies.
  3. Match the requirement to service-side auto-labeling for SharePoint and OneDrive.

Exam tip: Files at rest that nobody opens need a service-side auto-labeling policy.

AB-900 Microsoft Purview and Copilot Data Security: Sensitivity Labels, DLP, Retention and Responsible AI — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 2Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot

A compliance admin wants Microsoft Purview to find credit card numbers in emails and documents by using a definition Microsoft already provides, without supplying any sample files. What should the admin use?

Choose one.

  • a
    A sensitive information type Correct

    Microsoft provides built-in sensitive information types, such as Credit Card Number, that match patterns, checksums and supporting keywords.

  • b
    A pretrained trainable classifier

    Trainable classifiers recognise kinds of documents, such as resumes, rather than a specific number format like a card number.

  • c
    An exact data match classifier

    Exact data match needs you to upload your own table of values. The stem asks for something already provided.

  • d
    A document fingerprint from a form

    Fingerprinting matches documents based on a form or template you supply, not individual card numbers.

The concept

Data classification in Purview identifies sensitive items with sensitive information types (SITs), trainable classifiers and exact data match.

Why that’s the answer

Credit card numbers have a well-defined structure (format and checksum), which is exactly what a sensitive information type describes, and Microsoft ships one ready to use. Trainable classifiers are for categories of documents, exact data match compares against values you upload, and fingerprinting matches a template document.

How to reason it out
  1. Identify what is being detected: a structured number.
  2. Recall that SITs detect patterns with checksums and keywords.
  3. Reject methods that need your own data or describe whole document types.

Exam tip: Structured identifiers such as card or passport numbers: use a sensitive information type.

AB-900 Microsoft Purview and Copilot Data Security: Sensitivity Labels, DLP, Retention and Responsible AI — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 3Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot

A company wants Microsoft Purview to find resumes and source code wherever they're stored. These files don't contain any consistent number pattern or keyword list. Which classification method fits best?

Choose one.

  • a
    Custom sensitive information types with keyword lists

    Keyword-based SITs need consistent terms or patterns, which the stem says these files don't have.

  • b
    Built-in trainable classifiers for those categories Correct

    Trainable classifiers recognise a kind of document by what it looks like overall, and Microsoft provides ready-made ones such as resumes and source code.

  • c
    Exact data match with a table of known values

    Exact data match compares content with values from your own table, such as customer IDs. Resumes don't share such values.

  • d
    Document fingerprinting from a standard form

    Fingerprinting matches documents created from a template form. Resumes and code don't come from one template.

The concept

Trainable classifiers use machine learning to recognise categories of content rather than specific patterns.

Why that’s the answer

When the content is identified by what it is, not by a number pattern, a trainable classifier is the right tool. Microsoft ships pre-trained classifiers for categories such as resumes and source code, and you can train your own from samples. SITs need patterns or keywords, exact data match needs a table of values, and fingerprinting needs a template.

How to reason it out
  1. Note that there is no pattern or keyword to match.
  2. Recall that trainable classifiers recognise document categories.
  3. Choose the pre-trained classifiers for resumes and source code.

Exam tip: Recognise a kind of document (resume, contract, source code): trainable classifier.

AB-900 Microsoft Purview and Copilot Data Security: Sensitivity Labels, DLP, Retention and Responsible AI — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 4Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot

An insurer's DLP policy flags too many documents because any number in its policy-number format is detected. It wants an alert only for numbers that belong to actual policyholders. What should the admin use?

Choose one.

  • a
    A custom sensitive information type with a stricter regex

    A tighter pattern still matches any number in that format, real customer or not, so false positives remain.

  • b
    Exact data match using an uploaded policyholder table Correct

    Exact data match compares content with hashed values uploaded from your own records, so only real customers' numbers match.

  • c
    A trainable classifier trained on policyholder letters

    A trainable classifier recognises document types. It can't tell whether a number belongs to an actual customer.

  • d
    Document fingerprinting of the policy application form

    Fingerprinting matches documents based on the form, not whether the number in them is a real customer's.

The concept

Exact data match (EDM) classification matches content against actual values from a table you upload, instead of a generic pattern.

Why that’s the answer

The problem is false positives from pattern matching. Only exact data match checks the detected value against the organization's own data, so a number in the right format that isn't a real customer's doesn't trigger the policy. A stricter regex is still a pattern, a classifier recognises document categories, and fingerprinting recognises a template.

How to reason it out
  1. Identify the cause: pattern matching can't know which numbers are real.
  2. Recall that EDM compares against uploaded values from your own records.
  3. Choose exact data match for precise, low false-positive detection.

Exam tip: Need to match only your real records, not anything in that format: exact data match.

AB-900 Microsoft Purview and Copilot Data Security: Sensitivity Labels, DLP, Retention and Responsible AI — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 5Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot

A company wants users to see a warning tip, and to be stopped if needed, when they email or share files containing customer bank account numbers with people outside the organization. Which solution should the admin use?

Choose one.

  • a
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Correct

    DLP policies detect sensitive information when it is shared and can show policy tips, block, or allow an override.

  • b
    Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management

    Insider Risk Management correlates risky activity for investigators after the fact. It doesn't show a tip or stop a share.

  • c
    Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance

    Communication Compliance sends matched messages to reviewers. It doesn't warn users or block the send in the moment.

  • d
    Microsoft Purview Data Lifecycle Management

    Data Lifecycle Management keeps or deletes content on a schedule. It doesn't evaluate sharing.

The concept

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP) prevents sensitive information from being shared inappropriately across email, SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, devices and Copilot.

Why that’s the answer

The requirement is real-time: warn the user and optionally stop the action while they share. That is what DLP policies do with policy tips and block actions. Insider Risk Management and Communication Compliance surface activity or messages for review later, and Data Lifecycle Management controls retention.

How to reason it out
  1. Notice the need to act at the moment of sharing.
  2. Recall that DLP shows policy tips and can block.
  3. Reject solutions that only review or retain.

Exam tip: Warn or block while sensitive data is being shared: DLP.

AB-900 Microsoft Purview and Copilot Data Security: Sensitivity Labels, DLP, Retention and Responsible AI — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 6Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot

HR reports that an engineer has resigned. Security wants to correlate signals such as mass downloads from SharePoint and copying files to USB drives around the departure, with user names hidden from investigators by default. Which solution fits?

Choose one.

  • a
    Microsoft Purview Communication Compliance

    Communication Compliance inspects the content of messages, such as Teams chats and email. It doesn't correlate downloads and USB copies.

  • b
    Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

    DLP evaluates individual actions against rules. It doesn't build a risk picture of one user's behaviour over time.

  • c
    Microsoft Purview DSPM for AI

    DSPM for AI focuses on AI app use and sensitive data in prompts, not on a departing user's file activity.

  • d
    Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management Correct

    Insider Risk Management correlates activity signals, such as a departing user's data theft indicators, and pseudonymizes users by default.

The concept

Insider Risk Management uses policy templates such as data theft by departing users to correlate risky activities, with privacy controls like pseudonymization.

Why that’s the answer

The scenario combines a trigger (resignation reported by HR), several activity signals over time and a privacy requirement. Insider Risk Management is built for this: its policies score sequences of risky activity and show users with pseudonymized names unless an authorised investigator reveals them. Communication Compliance looks at message content, DLP evaluates single actions, and DSPM for AI covers AI usage.

How to reason it out
  1. Spot the pattern: a departing user and many activity signals.
  2. Recall the data theft by departing users template.
  3. Note the pseudonymization requirement, a privacy feature of Insider Risk Management.

Exam tip: Risky user behaviour over time, pseudonymized: Insider Risk Management.

AB-900 Microsoft Purview and Copilot Data Security: Sensitivity Labels, DLP, Retention and Responsible AI — the lesson that teaches this.

What AB-900 domain 2 tests, topic by topic

The official exam guide breaks Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot into 2 topics. The question bank follows the same split, so a weak topic shows up as a cluster of misses you can go back and read.

Published AB-900 practice questions per topic in Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot
TopicWhat it coversQuestions
Microsoft Purview and Copilot Data SecurityOfficial AB-900 study guide, "Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot" (skills measured as of October 14, 2026). "Understand Microsoft Purview": Understand features and capabilities of Microsoft Purview Information; Identify the use cases for sensitivity labels in Microsoft Purview; Understand data classification in Microsoft Purview; Understand retention. "Understand data security implications of Copilot": Understand how Copilot accesses data; Understand how Microsoft Graph influences Copilot responses; Understand how Copilot uses permissions and other controls in; Understand responsible AI principles.41
Data Protection Risks and SharePoint OversharingOfficial AB-900 study guide, "Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot" (skills measured as of October 14, 2026). "Identify data protection and governance risks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot": Identify compliance risks and recommendations by using Microsoft; Identify sensitive information by using Microsoft Purview Data; Identify risks by using Insider Risk Management; Identify and respond to alerts generated by Microsoft Purview DLP; Identify policy violations generated by Communication Compliance; Identify user activities reported by Microsoft Purview activity explorer; Discover and manage AI activity by using DSPM for AI; Search for files and emails by using Content search in Microsoft. "Identify and monitor oversharing in SharePoint in Microsoft 365": Identify the tools to troubleshoot oversharing in an organization; Run a data access governance report in SharePoint; Understand features and capabilities of SharePoint Advanced.41
Total82

Revise Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot before you drill it

Other AB-900 domains

Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot: your questions

Understand data protection and governance tasks for Microsoft 365 and Copilot is domain 2 of the AB-900 exam guide and carries 38% of the scored content — the heaviest of the 3 domains. On a 45-question paper that works out to roughly 17 questions, though Microsoft Azure does not publish an exact per-domain count and individual exam forms vary.

Source

The domain weight and topic list on this page come from the official AB-900 exam guide.