SaveMyCert
Log in
5 of 5 free questions left today·for 10 a day
CS0-004 · Domain 1

Security Operations practice questions

Security Operations is worth 34% of the CS0-004 exam — the heaviest of the 4 domains. System and network architecture in security operations, indicators of malicious activity, investigation tools, threat intelligence and hunting, process improvement and automation, and AI in the SOC. Official weighting 34%. 6 fully worked examples are further down this page, answers included.

Exam weight
34%
the heaviest of the 4 domains
Questions
204
across 6 topics
Free, no account
5/day
a free account allows 10 a day
Explanations
Every option
right and wrong

Build a practice session

5 free questions left today.

Domains

How many?

Mode

Ready when you are

10 fresh questions drawn across 1 of 4 domains, in Learn mode.

Review what you missed

Every question you answer incorrectly, and every question you flag while practising, is saved here automatically. Finish a session and you can come back to re-drill just those.

6 sample Security Operations questions, fully explained

Questions from the CS0-004 bank mapped to domain 1, with the answer key and the reasoning behind every option. None of them repeat the examples on the main CS0-004 practice page.

Question 1Security Operations

After a server compromise, investigators find the attacker cleared the server's local Security event log. A nightly copy of that log, kept on a second disk in the same server, had also been deleted. Which TWO measures would BEST have preserved the evidence? (Select TWO.)

Choose TWO.

  • a
    Raise the maximum size of the server's local Security log to keep more events

    A bigger local log is still on the compromised host and can be cleared just as easily.

  • b
    Forward events in near real time to a collector outside the server's admin control Correct

    Events leave the host as they are written, so clearing the local log afterwards cannot remove them.

  • c
    Enable object-access auditing on the server's system directories as well

    More audit categories create more events, but they sit in the same local log the attacker cleared.

  • d
    Run the log copy hourly instead of nightly to the second disk on the server

    The copy is still under the attacker's control on the same host, as the deleted nightly copy shows.

  • e
    Keep the collected logs on write-once storage with a retention lock applied Correct

    Write-once (WORM) storage with a retention lock stops even a privileged account from altering or deleting stored logs.

The concept

Log integrity means getting logs off the host quickly and storing them where they cannot be changed.

Why that’s the answer

An attacker with administrative rights on a host controls everything stored on it, including local logs and local copies. Near-real-time forwarding moves each event beyond the attacker's reach before it can be cleared, and immutable (write-once, retention-locked) storage protects the central copy from deletion or alteration. Larger logs, more audit categories and more frequent local copies all leave the evidence on the compromised machine.

How to reason it out
  1. Note that the attacker had admin rights on the server.
  2. Rule out anything that stores logs on the same host.
  3. Choose the control that moves logs off the host as they are created.
  4. Choose the control that makes the stored copy unalterable.

Exam tip: Logs that never leave the host can be erased by whoever owns the host; forward them and store them immutably.

CySA+ System and Network Architecture: Logging, OS, Cloud, IAM, Encryption and OT — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 2Security Operations

Process creation events from Windows workstations arrive in the SIEM, but analysts cannot see the arguments passed to any newly launched program, including cmd.exe, rundll32.exe and powershell.exe. Hunting rules for suspicious arguments therefore never match. Which change BEST closes this gap for every process?

Choose one.

  • a
    Enable PowerShell script block logging on the workstations through Group Policy

    Script block logging records PowerShell code only; cmd.exe and rundll32.exe arguments would still be missing.

  • b
    Raise the Security log size on the workstations so process creation events are kept longer

    Log size controls how long events are kept, not which fields each event contains.

  • c
    Enable object-access auditing on the system folders where new processes are created

    Object-access auditing records file and folder access, not the arguments a process was started with.

  • d
    Enable the audit policy option that adds command lines to process creation events Correct

    This Group Policy setting adds the full command line to process creation events for every program, which is exactly the missing field.

The concept

Log configuration decides which fields an event carries.

Why that’s the answer

Windows process creation auditing records that a process started, but the command line is only included when the separate policy setting to include it is enabled. Script block logging is a tempting near-twin, but it covers PowerShell alone, while the requirement is every process. Log size and object-access auditing change retention and other event types, not this field.

How to reason it out
  1. Identify the missing field: process arguments.
  2. Note the requirement covers every process, not just PowerShell.
  3. Choose the setting that adds the command line to process creation events.
  4. Reject settings that change retention or unrelated event types.

Exam tip: Command lines appear in Windows process creation events only after the include-command-line policy is enabled.

CySA+ System and Network Architecture: Logging, OS, Cloud, IAM, Encryption and OT — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 3Security Operations

A SOC onboards a new cloud application as a SIEM log source. Events arrive on time, but correlation rules that use source IP address and user name never fire for this source, because both values appear only inside one unstructured message field. Which ingestion step was MOST likely missed?

Choose one.

  • a
    Creating a parser that maps the source's fields to the SIEM's normalized schema Correct

    Rules match on normalized fields; until a parser extracts the IP and user into those fields, the rules have nothing to match.

  • b
    Synchronizing the new source's clock with the organization's internal NTP time source

    The events arrive on time, and clock skew would misorder events rather than hide their fields.

  • c
    Encrypting the transport between the new source and the SIEM collector with TLS

    TLS protects events in transit; it does not split a message field into searchable values.

  • d
    Lengthening the retention period for the new source's events in hot storage

    Retention controls how long events are kept, not whether their fields are extracted.

The concept

Ingestion includes parsing and normalization, not just receiving data.

Why that’s the answer

A SIEM correlates on normalized fields such as source IP and user. When a new source is onboarded without a parser (or with the wrong one), its events are stored but their values stay buried in a raw message, so field-based rules never match. Time sync, transport encryption and retention all matter for logging, but none extracts fields.

How to reason it out
  1. Note that events arrive and are stored.
  2. Note that the needed values sit inside one raw field.
  3. Recognize that rules match on normalized fields.
  4. Conclude that parsing/normalization was skipped.

Exam tip: If events arrive but rules never fire on their fields, check parsing and normalization.

CySA+ System and Network Architecture: Logging, OS, Cloud, IAM, Encryption and OT — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 4Security Operations

A retailer must keep audit logs from its cardholder data systems for at least 12 months, with the most recent three months immediately available for analysis. SIEM hot storage is the most expensive tier it uses. Which retention design meets the requirement at the LOWEST cost?

Choose one.

  • a
    Keep three months in SIEM hot storage and nine more in restorable archive storage Correct

    This meets both the three-month immediate-access rule and the 12-month total while keeping only a quarter of the data in the expensive tier.

  • b
    Keep the full 12 months in SIEM hot storage so each event stays instantly searchable

    This meets the requirement but stores nine extra months in the most expensive tier, so it is not the lowest-cost design.

  • c
    Keep three months in SIEM hot storage and delete events as they age out of that tier

    This is cheapest but discards logs after three months, breaking the 12-month retention rule.

  • d
    Keep the full 12 months in archive storage and restore it to the SIEM on request

    This is cheap but fails the requirement that the most recent three months be immediately available.

The concept

Retention requirements often specify both a total period and an immediately available period.

Why that’s the answer

PCI DSS, for example, requires at least 12 months of audit log history with the most recent three months immediately available. A tiered design satisfies both: recent data in fast, searchable storage and older data in cheaper archive storage that can be restored. Keeping everything hot works but costs more; deleting after three months or archiving everything each break one half of the requirement.

How to reason it out
  1. List both constraints: 12 months total and three months immediate.
  2. Discard designs that break either constraint.
  3. Compare the remaining designs on cost.
  4. Choose the tiered design.

Exam tip: Meet retention with tiers: recent logs hot and searchable, older logs in cheaper restorable archive.

CySA+ System and Network Architecture: Logging, OS, Cloud, IAM, Encryption and OT — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 5Security Operations

A systems team is building a new standard Linux server image. The security analyst wants the image configured and later audited against a recognized, consensus-based set of secure configuration settings for that specific operating system. Which source BEST fits this need?

Choose one.

  • a
    A CVSS base score report for the distribution's packages

    CVSS rates the severity of vulnerabilities; it does not prescribe configuration settings.

  • b
    A MITRE ATT&CK technique list for the Linux platform

    ATT&CK describes adversary techniques for detection and hunting, not a configuration baseline.

  • c
    A CIS Benchmark for the distribution and version in use Correct

    CIS Benchmarks are consensus-developed secure configuration baselines per OS and version, and they can be audited automatically.

  • d
    An OWASP Top 10 list for the web applications on the host

    The OWASP Top 10 ranks web application risks; it does not define operating system settings.

The concept

System hardening applies a secure configuration baseline to an operating system.

Why that’s the answer

Hardening starts from a documented baseline. CIS Benchmarks give version-specific, consensus-developed settings (services, permissions, logging, authentication) and can be checked with automated tools. CVSS, ATT&CK and the OWASP Top 10 are all security frameworks a SOC uses, but for scoring, adversary behavior and web risk respectively.

How to reason it out
  1. Identify the need: a secure configuration baseline for one OS.
  2. Match it to configuration guidance rather than risk scoring or threat models.
  3. Choose the CIS Benchmark.

Exam tip: Hardening baseline for an OS = CIS Benchmark (or a vendor/government equivalent such as a STIG).

CySA+ System and Network Architecture: Logging, OS, Cloud, IAM, Encryption and OT — the lesson that teaches this.

Question 6Security Operations

Users of one Windows workstation are sent to a lookalike banking site when they type the bank's correct URL. Other workstations using the same DNS servers and the same proxy reach the real site. Which file should the analyst inspect FIRST?

Choose one.

  • a
    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\services

    The services file maps service names to port numbers; it does not affect name resolution.

  • b
    C:\Windows\System32\config\SAM

    The SAM hive stores local account password hashes, not name-to-address mappings.

  • c
    C:\Windows\System32\drivers\etc\hosts Correct

    The hosts file is checked before DNS, so a malicious entry there redirects only this workstation while others resolve correctly.

  • d
    C:\Windows\System32\config\SYSTEM

    The SYSTEM hive holds system configuration, and a redirect limited to one URL points to local name resolution, not this hive.

The concept

Critical files: the hosts file overrides DNS on a single machine.

Why that’s the answer

Windows resolves names from the hosts file before querying DNS. Because other workstations using the same DNS and proxy work correctly, the fault is local to this machine, and a hosts entry mapping the bank's name to an attacker's IP is the classic cause. The services file sits in the same folder but maps ports to names; SAM and SYSTEM are registry hives with other jobs.

How to reason it out
  1. Note that only one machine is affected.
  2. Rule out shared infrastructure (DNS, proxy).
  3. Recall that the hosts file is consulted before DNS.
  4. Inspect the hosts file first.

Exam tip: One host redirected while its neighbors are fine: check the hosts file before DNS.

CySA+ System and Network Architecture: Logging, OS, Cloud, IAM, Encryption and OT — the lesson that teaches this.

What CS0-004 domain 1 tests, topic by topic

The official exam guide breaks Security Operations into 6 topics. The question bank follows the same split, so a weak topic shows up as a cluster of misses you can go back and read.

Published CS0-004 practice questions per topic in Security Operations
TopicWhat it coversQuestions
Explain concepts related to system and network architecture in security operationsOfficial CS0-004 objective 1.1. Logging (ingestion, configuration, integrity and security, time synchronization, retention); operating system concepts (hardening, file structure and critical files, system processes); cloud-native, virtualization, containerization and APIs; mobile and endpoint device management; network architecture (ZTNA, SASE, hybrid cloud); IAM (PAM, authentication and authorization methods, secrets management); encryption; data protection; critical infrastructure (OT, ICS, SCADA).34
Given a scenario, analyze indicators of potential malicious activityOfficial CS0-004 objective 1.2. Network indicators (rogue devices, enumeration, anomalous activity, unexpected ports); host indicators (resource consumption, unauthorized software, rogue processes, LOLBins and scripts, file system changes, data exfiltration, unauthorized configuration); application indicators (service disruption, anomalous activity); cloud indicators (anomalous activity, resource compromise); social engineering (typosquatting, URL shorteners); identity indicators (IAM account compromise, unauthorized access, impossible travel); business email compromise.34
Given a scenario, use tools to determine malicious activityOfficial CS0-004 objective 1.3. Decoding (CyberChef); packet analysis (Wireshark, tcpdump, Snort, Suricata, Zeek); SIEM log analysis; threat-intelligence platforms (OTX, MISP, OpenCTI); EDR/XDR and MDM; domain and IP reputation (WHOIS, AbuseIPDB, GeoIP); file analysis (strings, VirusTotal, YARA); sandboxing (Joe Sandbox, Cuckoo); pattern recognition (regular expressions, suspicious commands); email analysis (MXToolbox); UEBA (OpenUBA); file formats (JSON, XML, YAML, EVTX); Python, PowerShell and shell script.34
Explain threat intelligence and threat-hunting conceptsOfficial CS0-004 objective 1.4. Threat actors (APT, insider threat); TTPs (heat maps, Pyramid of Pain, MITRE ATT&CK, attribution); confidence (timeliness, relevance, accuracy); collection methods and sources (OSINT, closed-source, sharing); indicators of compromise (collection, analysis, application, atomic vs behavioral); threat modeling (STRIDE); threat mapping; cyber deception.34
Explain the importance of efficiency and process improvement in security operationsOfficial CS0-004 objective 1.5. Standardizing processes (team coordination, playbook/runbook creation); streamlining operations (automation and orchestration with SOAR and IaC; data enrichment through rule/alert tuning and dashboards); technology and tool integration (APIs, webhooks, plug-ins).34
Summarize concepts related to the use of AI in security operationsOfficial CS0-004 objective 1.6 (new in V4). AI risks (hallucinations, data exposure, model poisoning, malicious prompts); governance (legal or regulatory compliance, AI usage policies); use cases (comparing artifacts, analyzing log files, document creation, incident investigation, event correlation, automation and orchestration).34
Total204

Revise Security Operations before you drill it

Other CS0-004 domains

Security Operations: your questions

Security Operations is domain 1 of the CS0-004 exam guide and carries 34% of the scored content — the heaviest of the 4 domains. On a 85-question paper that works out to roughly 29 questions, though CompTIA does not publish an exact per-domain count and individual exam forms vary.

Source

The domain weight and topic list on this page come from the official CS0-004 exam guide.