An engineer hard-sets a switch access port with speed 100 and duplex full to stop it renegotiating. The attached workstation's 10/100/1000 NIC is left at autonegotiation. Which outcome should the engineer expect on this link?
Choose one.
Autonegotiation against a hard-set peer: speed is sensed, duplex falls back to half at 10/100 Mb/s.
Two facts combine. First, a port with speed and duplex hard-coded stops sending autonegotiation advertisements, so the autonegotiating NIC uses parallel detection: it senses 100 Mb/s from the signal, but it cannot learn the duplex and, per IEEE 802.3, defaults to half duplex at 10 or 100 Mb/s. Second, the resulting duplex mismatch shows CRC errors and runts on the full-duplex end (the switch) and late collisions on the half-duplex end (the NIC). The tempting near-twin puts the late collisions on the wrong end.
- Recognise that forcing speed and duplex disables autonegotiation on the switch port.
- Recall parallel detection: speed is sensed, duplex is not.
- Apply the fallback rule: 10/100 Mb/s falls back to half duplex.
- Place the counters: CRC/runts on the full-duplex end, late collisions on the half-duplex end.
Exam tip: Hard-set one end and autonegotiate the other, and you build a duplex mismatch: set both to auto or both to the same fixed values.
CCNA Interface and Cable Issues: Duplex, Errors, Copper and Fiber Troubleshooting — the lesson that teaches this.