Investigating and Remediating Defender XDR Alerts for SC-200: Office 365, Purview, Defender for Cloud, Cloud Apps, Entra ID and Defender for Identity
Investigating and remediating alerts in Microsoft Defender XDR means working each workload's alerts from the Microsoft Defender portal and taking the response action that workload offers: email remediation in Defender for Office 365, data and insider risk response for Microsoft Purview, the Take action tab in Defender for Cloud, governance actions in Defender for Cloud Apps, risky-user remediation in Microsoft Entra ID Protection, and identity actions in Defender for Identity. For SC-200 the skill is choosing the action that does exactly what a scenario needs, such as recoverable versus permanent deletion, ending sessions versus blocking the account, or a one-off action versus a rule for future alerts, and knowing how automatic attack disruption shows what it already contained.
On this page10 sections
- Remediating email threats with Defender for Office 365
- Submissions and the Tenant Allow/Block List
- Responding to a compromised mailbox
- Investigating incidents contained by automatic attack disruption
- Purview DLP and insider risk alerts in the Defender portal
- Defender for Cloud workload protection alerts
- Defender for Cloud Apps governance actions and anomaly tuning
- Remediating risky users in Microsoft Entra ID Protection
- Defender for Identity remediation actions
- Triaging Defender for Identity alerts
- Remediate delivered email with the right Threat Explorer action and approval path, and explain what triggers or stops automated investigations in Defender for Office 365 Plan 2
- Use submissions, the Tenant Allow/Block List and anti-phishing trusted senders for false positives and negatives, and clean up a compromised or restricted mailbox
- Recognise incidents contained by automatic attack disruption and explain where disable user runs for AD, hybrid and cloud-only accounts
- Triage Purview DLP and Insider Risk Management alerts in the Defender portal with the right permissions, status mapping and hunting tables
- Respond to Defender for Cloud alerts from the Take action tab and explain how they integrate with Defender XDR
- Choose Defender for Cloud Apps governance actions and Entra ID Protection remediations by their effect on access, sessions and risk
- Apply Defender for Identity remediation actions and tune or remediate its alerts, including DCSync and AS-REP Roasting
Remediating email threats with Defender for Office 365
In Microsoft Defender for Office 365 you remediate delivered malicious email from Threat Explorer (Plan 2) or Real-time detections (Plan 1), choosing an action that decides where the message ends up and who can still recover it. Real-time detections shows detections at delivery time only; Threat Explorer has everything Real-time detections has and adds post-delivery activity (for example who clicked a link) plus the All email and Campaigns views and more filters and actions.
| Action | Where the message goes | Who can get it back |
|---|---|---|
| Move to junk folder | Junk Email | The user, who can still open it |
| Move to deleted items | Deleted Items | The user, who can still open it |
| Soft delete | Recoverable Items\Deletions, out of every folder the user browses | The user or an admin |
| Hard delete | Purged | Only an admin, through single item recovery |
Move to inbox is the reverse action, for messages that turn out to be false positives.
Approval. An analyst who holds the Search and Purge role can act directly. An analyst without it, or one whose policy requires sign-off, uses add to remediation: the selected messages go into a remediation that waits on the Action center Pending tab, where someone with Search and Purge approves it; it then moves to the History tab.
Automated investigation and response (AIR)
AIR is a Defender for Office 365 Plan 2 capability. Investigations start from the default alert policies in the Threat management category whose Automated investigation value is Yes, for example the policy for user-reported phishing, post-delivery removal of malware or phishing by zero-hour auto purge (ZAP), clicks on URLs that turn malicious, and signs of a compromised user. Two behaviours matter:
- If a default alert policy is disabled or replaced by a custom copy, AIR is no longer triggered for it. The custom policy still raises alerts, but it cannot start investigations, so the fix is to re-enable the default policy.
- Built-in alert tuning rules (for example auto-resolving alerts for user-reported messages) suppress alerts without stopping AIR. If the investigation finds malicious or suspicious activity, the alert is reactivated, so threats still surface.
Remediation actions proposed by AIR can be approved inside the investigation, the incident or the Action center. The Action center Pending tab is the one queue that lists both AIR actions and manual remediations submitted from Threat Explorer.
Submissions and the Tenant Allow/Block List
Admin submissions send a message, URL or file to Microsoft for analysis and can create an allow or block entry in the Tenant Allow/Block List in the same step. The entry type and its expiry depend on the direction of the mistake and on which protection made the verdict.
| Situation | What to do | Entry and default expiry |
|---|---|---|
| Malicious mail got through | Submit as Should have been blocked and select block for the sender or domain | Block entry; Remove block entry after defaults to 30 days, with Never expire or a specific date of up to 30 days |
| Spam filtering blocked good mail | Submit as Should not have been blocked and allow it | Allow entry (domain/address, URL or file) kept until 45 days after the filtering system last finds the entity clean, then removed |
| Spoof intelligence blocked good mail | Submit as Should not have been blocked and allow it | Entry on the Spoofed senders tab; spoofed-sender allows never expire |
| User or domain impersonation keeps flagging a legitimate sender | Add the sender to Trusted senders and domains in the anti-phishing policy that detected it (an allow entry is the other documented route) | Policy setting; the protected users stay protected against everyone else |
Two details decide many scenarios. Only Never expire keeps a block in place until someone removes it, and a domain block covers every message from the domain while a URL block covers only the links. A false-positive submission does not automatically override impersonation protection, so a recurring impersonation false positive needs the anti-phishing policy change. Anti-spam allowed-domain lists, mail flow rules that set SCL -1 and Outlook Safe Senders bypass filtering without sending anything to Microsoft and without lapsing on their own, which is why submissions are preferred for false positives.
Responding to a compromised mailbox
A compromised mailbox is fully cleaned up only when the attacker's access paths are removed as well as the password: sessions, app passwords, MFA methods, forwarding and inbox rules. Microsoft's response steps are:
- Reset the password (or disable the account while you investigate) and require MFA.
- Revoke sign-in sessions, which invalidates refresh tokens issued before the reset; otherwise existing tokens keep working.
- Have the user delete and recreate app passwords, which a password reset doesn't revoke, and review registered MFA methods for one the attacker added.
- Remove attacker forwarding and inbox rules.
- If the account was restricted from sending, unblock it once it is secure.
Finding redirection. Hidden inbox rules don't appear in Outlook or in Get-InboxRule without the switch, so check with Exchange Online PowerShell:
Get-InboxRule -Mailbox jason -IncludeHidden | fl
Get-Mailbox -Identity jason | fl Forwarding*,DeliverToMailboxAndForwardForwardingAddress forwards to an internal recipient and ForwardingSmtpAddress to any SMTP address. When both are set, mail is forwarded only to the ForwardingAddress recipient; DeliverToMailboxAndForward set to True also keeps a copy in the mailbox. An attacker's external address set alongside an internal forward still has to be cleared, because it takes effect as soon as the internal forward is removed.
Restricted senders. A mailbox that exceeds the service sending limits or the outbound spam policy limits can still receive mail but can't send; it is listed on the Restricted entities page and its messages bounce with 550 5.1.8 Access denied, bad outbound sender. After securing the account, an admin selects Unblock on that page or runs Remove-BlockedSenderAddress in Exchange Online PowerShell.
Investigating incidents contained by automatic attack disruption
Automatic attack disruption is Defender XDR's high-confidence containment of attacks such as business email compromise (BEC) and adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) phishing, and analysts recognise its work by the Attack Disruption tag on an incident. Configuring it, its exclusions and undoing actions in the Action center belong to the automation lesson for task 1.1; this topic is about investigating what it did.
- Incident queue: an Attack Disruption tag beside each incident where it acted, so filtering on the tag lists every containment to review.
- Incident page: the tag, a yellow banner describing the action taken, and the contained assets marked in the incident graph.
- API: (attack disruption) is appended to the titles of high-confidence incidents that are likely to be disrupted. It is a signal for API consumers, not the portal's record of a containment.
Identity actions include disable user, revoke session and suspend user. Where disable user runs depends on where the account lives:
| Account | How it is disabled |
|---|---|
| Active Directory only | By Microsoft Defender for Identity through onboarded domain controllers with the sensor |
| Synced (hybrid) | In Active Directory through those domain controllers, and also in Microsoft Entra ID |
| Cloud-only Microsoft Entra ID | In Entra ID through a Microsoft-managed enterprise application (Microsoft Defender for Identity), which checks RBAC first; this doesn't depend on deploying Defender for Identity |
So a hybrid user disabled in Entra ID but still enabled in Active Directory points to missing sensors on the domain controllers, because sensors on other server roles don't perform remediation.
Purview DLP and insider risk alerts in the Defender portal
Microsoft Purview data loss prevention (DLP) and Insider Risk Management alerts can be triaged in the Microsoft Defender portal alongside security alerts, but each needs its own permissions and has its own rules for how it appears.
DLP alerts
From 12 October 2026 a built-in alert tuning rule, Set-As-Behavior - Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Alerts, is enabled by default. It turns DLP signals into behaviors instead of alerts, so they no longer create alerts or incidents in Defender XDR but stay huntable in the BehaviorInfo and BehaviorEntities tables. To get DLP signals back as alerts, disable that rule under Settings > Microsoft Defender XDR > Alert tuning. While the rule is on it overrides the alert settings in the DLP policy itself.
| Permission | Alerts it opens in Defender |
|---|---|
| Manage Alerts; View-Only Manage Alerts | DLP alerts and other security alerts |
| Information Protection Analyst; DLP Compliance Management; View-Only DLP Compliance Management | DLP alerts only |
The read-only, DLP-only combination is View-Only DLP Compliance Management. For a DLP alert on a SharePoint Online or OneDrive file, the alert offers in-place actions: apply a retention label, apply a sensitivity label, unshare, delete, download and withdraw feedback. Unshare ends oversharing while the owner keeps the file; delete removes it.
Insider risk alerts
Viewing and managing Insider Risk Management alerts in Defender needs a Microsoft Entra role (Security Operator or Security Reader) plus membership of a Purview insider risk role group: Insider Risk Management, Insider Risk Management Analysts or Insider Risk Management Investigators. The least-privileged pairing is Security Reader with Insider Risk Management Analysts; Security Operator and the full Insider Risk Management role group grant more than viewing and triaging alerts needs. Status changes sync between the portals (within about 30 minutes):
| Defender status and classification | Purview status |
|---|---|
| New or In progress | Needs review |
| Resolved, True positive | Confirmed |
| Resolved, Informational, expected activity or False positive | Dismissed |
| Resolved with no classification | Dismissed (default) |
In advanced hunting, AlertInfo and AlertEvidence hold the alerts and their entities, DataSecurityBehaviors holds insights into potentially suspicious user behaviour, and DataSecurityEvents holds the enriched events for user activities that violate Purview policies, such as a file uploaded to a personal cloud drive.
Defender for Cloud workload protection alerts
A Microsoft Defender for Cloud alert is worked from its Take action tab, which has five sections that each do one job.
| Section | What it does |
|---|---|
| Inspect resource context | Opens the resource's logs around the time of the alert, to investigate before deciding |
| Mitigate the threat | Manual remediation steps for this alert |
| Prevent future attacks | Security recommendations that harden the resource |
| Trigger automated response | Trigger logic app runs a logic app for this alert now |
| Suppress similar alerts | Create suppression rule stops future alerts with similar characteristics |
Setting an alert's status to Dismissed closes that one alert; benign activity that recurs (an approved scanner, say) calls for a suppression rule. Likewise, Trigger logic app handles one alert now, while workflow automation runs a logic app for future alerts that match a trigger.
Defender for Cloud in Defender XDR
With the Defender XDR integration on, Defender for Cloud alerts and incidents from all subscriptions appear in the Defender portal, with three rules to remember:
- Informational alerts are not integrated; they are reviewed in Defender for Cloud only.
- Status changes for Defender for Cloud alerts sync both ways, so resolving one in either portal resolves it in the other.
- Defender for Endpoint alerts on cloud resources appear in both portals, but their statuses are not synchronized, so they must be closed in each.
To narrow the Defender portal's alert queue to one Azure subscription, filter on the alert subscription ID.
Defender for Cloud Apps governance actions and anomaly tuning
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps remediates risky users with governance actions, and each action changes something different: access, sessions or risk.
| Action | Effect | Account blocked? |
|---|---|---|
| Suspend user | Blocks sign-in in Microsoft Entra ID | Yes, but for a user synced from on-premises Active Directory the on-premises setting overrides it and the suspension is reverted |
| Require user to sign in again | Revokes refresh tokens and session cookies, ending current sessions (including a replayed stolen cookie) | No |
| Confirm user compromised | Sets the Entra ID user risk to High, so user risk-based Conditional Access (for example a secure password change) applies at next sign-in | No, and sessions keep working on their own |
| Notify user | Sends a message; changes nothing technically | No |
The actions combine: Require user to sign in again plus Confirm user compromised ends the attacker's sessions now and sends the user through the risk policy at next sign-in without blocking the account. To keep a synced user blocked, disable the account in Active Directory, for example with Defender for Identity's Disable action, which syncs to Entra ID.
Tuning anomaly detection policies
- Scope: change All users and groups to Specific users and groups, then Include or Exclude. An excluded user never triggers that policy, even inside an included group, so one frequent traveller can be excluded from Activity from infrequent country/region without turning the policy off.
- Impossible travel sensitivity: the slider sets how many suppressions apply (Low applies the most, High keeps only system suppressions). Travel between IP addresses that are both considered safe, for example tagged Corporate, is trusted unless the slider is on High.
- Learning period: anomaly policies build a baseline of users, devices, locations and activities; during the initial seven-day learning period not all anomaly alerts are raised.
Remediating risky users in Microsoft Entra ID Protection
Microsoft Entra ID Protection remediates a compromised identity either automatically, through risk-based Conditional Access policies, or manually from the Risky users page. The manual options are:
| Option | When to use it | Least privileged role |
|---|---|---|
| Dismiss user risk | The investigation shows the account isn't compromised; risk is cleared, the password untouched | Security Operator |
| Confirm user compromised | Compromise is confirmed; risk is set to High | Security Operator |
| Reset password / generate a temporary password | Clears risk by changing the password | From ID Protection: Security Operator (to reach ID Protection) plus User Administrator (to reset); from the user's own page, User Administrator alone |
| Block user | The attacker could reset the password or complete MFA | An admin role that can block sign-in |
Editing risk-based policies is a separate task whose least privileged role is Security Administrator. When compromise is confirmed and no policy has remediated it, Microsoft's follow-ups are to request a password change, block the user if you suspect the attacker can reset the password or do MFA for the user, revoke refresh tokens, and disable compromised devices. If the attacker registered their own authenticator, a self-service secure password change would let the attacker remediate the risk, so block and revoke instead.
Hybrid users. An on-premises password change (for example Ctrl+Alt+Del on a hybrid-joined device) clears user risk only when password hash synchronization is in place and the opt-in setting Allow on-premises password change to reset user risk is turned on in the Identity Protection settings.
Defender for Identity remediation actions
Microsoft Defender for Identity remediation actions are taken from an identity's page in the Defender portal, and which ones apply depends on where the account lives.
| Action | What it does | Applies to |
|---|---|---|
| Disable | Prevents sign-in on all accounts linked to the identity, immediately; profile, groups and data are kept | Active Directory and Entra ID |
| Enable | Re-enables accounts previously disabled for the identity | Active Directory and Entra ID |
| Force password change | The user must set a new password at next sign-in | Active Directory and Entra ID |
| Revoke session | Revokes active sessions | Entra ID (and Okta) |
| Mark as compromised | Raises the user's risk level | Entra ID |
For an account that exists only in Active Directory, Revoke session and Mark as compromised don't apply. Force password change is unsafe when the attacker knows the current password, because whoever signs in next sets the new one; Disable stops sign-in at once. For a hybrid identity, check which directories each action reaches: blocking sign-in and ending existing cloud sessions are separate actions.
How the actions run. Only sensors installed on domain controllers perform Active Directory remediation, and they act with the domain controller's local system account. Under Manage action accounts, the option Automatically use the sensor's local system account is required when any sensor is v3.x; with a separately configured action account the actions fail.
Triaging Defender for Identity alerts
Triaging a Defender for Identity alert means classifying it (true positive, benign true positive or false positive), applying the alert-specific remediation, and tuning recurring benign alerts with the tool that matches the alert's format.
Classic versus Defender format. Defender for Identity alerts appear in two formats, shown by the alert's Detection source. Classic detections are tuned with Excluded entities under System > Settings > Identities (per detection, or global). Exclusions there no longer apply to detections that moved to the Defender XDR detection engine; for those, create a Microsoft Defender alert tuning rule. Classifying each alert records a verdict but suppresses nothing.
| Alert | What it means | Remediation and prevention |
|---|---|---|
| Suspected DCSync attack (replication of directory services) | A replication request started from a computer that isn't recognised as a domain controller, to pull directory data including password hashes | Audit who holds Replicating Directory Changes and Replicating Directory Changes All. A domain controller with no sensor may not be recognised as one, which is why every DC needs a sensor |
| Suspected AS-REP Roasting attack | Accounts with Kerberos preauthentication disabled return AS-REP data that can be cracked offline | Enable Kerberos preauthentication on those accounts |
| Suspected Kerberos SPN exposure | Service tickets for accounts with service principal names are requested to crack the service account password offline | Use long, random service account passwords, for example group managed service accounts |
When an alert traces back to a gap in sensor coverage, closing the gap is the durable fix: it classifies the alert as a benign true positive and restores detection, where suppressing the source would hide future attacks too.
Tip. Questions on this topic are short SOC scenarios in which an alert from one Defender workload, Purview or Entra ID has been raised and the analyst must choose the remediation, setting or permission that meets a stated constraint, such as keeping a message user-recoverable, ending sessions without blocking the account, acting on one alert rather than future ones, or least privilege. The options are usually real actions from the same product that differ in scope or effect, so knowing what each changes and what it leaves alone decides the item. Expect near-twins: soft versus hard delete, block versus allow entry expiry, dismiss versus suppression rule, Suspend user versus Require user to sign in again versus Confirm user compromised, Excluded entities versus alert tuning rules, and DataSecurityEvents versus DataSecurityBehaviors. Some items show Exchange Online PowerShell output or ask for Select TWO answers, and several rely on documented limits: which alerts never sync, which sensors remediate, which policies trigger investigations and what an on-premises password change can clear.
- Soft delete hides a message from every folder but stays recoverable by the user; hard delete leaves only admin recovery. Without Search and Purge, add to remediation and approve on the Action center Pending tab.
- AIR in Defender for Office 365 Plan 2 starts from the default alert policies; disabling or replacing one with a custom copy stops its investigations, while built-in tuning rules don't.
- Submission blocks default to 30 days (choose Never expire to keep them); false-positive allows last 45 days after last use; spoofed-sender allows never expire; impersonation false positives need Trusted senders and domains.
- After a password reset, still revoke sessions, replace app passwords and check hidden inbox rules and Forwarding* settings; unblock a 5.1.8 sender on Restricted entities.
- Attack disruption marks its work with the Attack Disruption tag; disabling an AD account needs Defender for Identity sensors on domain controllers, a cloud-only user doesn't.
- DLP signals became behaviors in BehaviorInfo in October 2026 until the built-in DLP tuning rule is disabled; an insider risk alert resolved as True positive shows Confirmed in Purview.
- In Defender for Cloud, dismiss closes one alert and a suppression rule stops similar ones; informational alerts never reach Defender XDR and Defender for Endpoint alerts on cloud resources don't sync status.
- Require user to sign in again ends sessions, Confirm user compromised raises risk to High, and Suspend user blocks access but is reverted for synced users.
- Dismiss user risk needs Security Operator; a temporary password from ID Protection needs Security Operator plus User Administrator; on-premises password changes clear risk only with PHS and the opt-in setting.
- Defender for Identity Active Directory remediation runs only from domain controller sensors using the local system account, while Entra ID actions run through a Microsoft-managed enterprise app; Excluded entities tune classic alerts and alert tuning rules tune Defender-format ones.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between soft delete and hard delete in Threat Explorer?
Soft delete moves a message to the Recoverable Items\Deletions folder, out of every folder the user browses, and both the user and an admin can still recover it. Hard delete purges the message so that only an admin can recover it, through single item recovery.
Why did automated investigations stop after an alert policy was copied?
Automated investigation and response in Defender for Office 365 Plan 2 starts only from the default alert policies marked for automated investigation. If a default policy is disabled or replaced by a custom policy with the same conditions, alerts still appear but no investigations start; re-enabling the default policy restores them.
How long does a Tenant Allow/Block List entry created from a submission last?
A block entry created from a submission defaults to 30 days and can instead be set to Never expire or a specific date. An allow entry for a domain, address, URL or file is kept until 45 days after the filtering system last finds the entity clean. Allow entries for spoofed senders never expire.
Why are DLP alerts missing from the Defender XDR incident queue since October 2026?
The built-in alert tuning rule Set-As-Behavior - Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Alerts, enabled by default from 12 October 2026, turns DLP signals into behaviors, which are huntable in the BehaviorInfo and BehaviorEntities tables but no longer create alerts or incidents. Disabling that rule under Settings > Microsoft Defender XDR > Alert tuning brings the alerts back.
Which Defender for Cloud alerts don't appear in Microsoft Defender XDR?
Informational-severity Defender for Cloud alerts are not integrated into the Defender portal and must be reviewed in Defender for Cloud. Other Defender for Cloud alerts appear in Defender XDR and their status syncs both ways, while Defender for Endpoint alerts on cloud resources appear in both portals without status sync.
What does Confirm user compromised do in Defender for Cloud Apps?
Confirm user compromised sets the user's risk level in Microsoft Entra ID to High, so user risk-based Conditional Access policies, such as one requiring a secure password change, apply at the next sign-in. It doesn't block the account or end current sessions; Require user to sign in again does the latter.
Why do Defender for Identity remediation actions fail on Active Directory accounts?
Defender for Identity performs Active Directory actions only through sensors on domain controllers, using the sensor's local system account. Actions fail if no domain controller sensor is present, or if a v3.x sensor is configured with a separate action account instead of the 'Automatically use the sensor's local system account' option.
How do I clear Entra ID user risk without changing the user's password?
When an investigation shows the account isn't compromised, select Dismiss user risk on the Risky users page in Microsoft Entra ID Protection. Security Operator is the least privileged role that can do this, and the user's password is left unchanged.
Source
This lesson covers the "Respond to security incidents" domain of the official SC-200 exam guide. Vendors revise their guides — check the source for the current version.
- Microsoft SC-200 study guide — Microsoft Learn
Sign up free to mark lessons complete, bookmark topics and track your exam readiness.